Your Legacy – Charity Perspective #20 #cong24 #legacy

Synopsis:

Let’s be ambitious to dramatically grow legacy income for charities. How do we increase legacy giving in Ireland? Lots of data, psychology, discussion around opportunities for ‘making a difference’, family dynamics, incentives and more will be covered.

Total Words

891

Reading Time in Minutes

4

Key Takeaways:

  1. People in Ireland pro rata leave less than one third to charity in their wills of what our UK counterparts leave.
  2. Inheritances and the probate system reinforce rather than spread wealth for the benefit of society.
  3. New research is emerging on the legacy giving patterns in Ireland and more is needed.
  4. Leaving a charitable gift has feel good benefits for the legator (person writing their will) and is good for society generally.

About Niall O'Sullivan:

Niall O’Sullivan: Niall established Campaign Solutions as a fundraising consultancy. This business also has a brand – Legacy Insights. He chairs a membership organisation called My Legacy (it has 90 charity members). As friends will tell you, he thinks and talks about legacy pretty much every day. A child of the late 1960s, he comes from Wexford but has lived in Dublin most of his life – with a few gaps in Australia, UK and USA. Niall went to college in DCU. He is married with two fab teenagers. He has worked in the not for profit sector for over 20 years. As well as self-employment he worked in Community Foundation Ireland, Trinity Foundation and more. Niall’s consultancy work is increasingly focussing on legacies – aka charitable bequests or gifts in wills. This includes research on legacies, legacy training, legacy plans and he established FreeWill.ie in 2024 also. Among his clients are charities, universities and schools.

Contacting Niall O'Sullivan:

You can contact with Niall via email, see his work on Campaign Solutions or connect with him in LinkedIn.

By Turlough Rafferty

We think of ourselves as a generous nation. We volunteer, we donate, we help people out. Some people also leave a gift in their Will to charity. But most don’t. Many more could. That’s a key focus of my work. Each year between €8 billion and €10 billion is passed on via wills. It’s everybody’s personal choice what they want to do with their wealth. Most default to leaving it to a spouse and children. As we age, the age of our inheriting ‘children’ is also rising – some now are in their 70s by the time their parents die. Do they need a bequest?

690,000 families have received a bequest over the last 20 years according to the Central Bank. The average value of such transfers in 2020 terms was €229,335. These are welcome transfers no doubt in many cases, but are not needed in all. To a significant degree the probate process simply reinforces wealth. It may not be stated as such, but that’s it’s job.

Leaving a gift to charity is an outlier thought but a wonderful way to support wider society. People helped by charities are far less likely to inherit and far less likely to write a will as they may not have anything to leave. Some people leave money for animals, some to niche causes, some to education, health research, to support the poorest of the poor overseas. Imaging what we could achieve if people left €400m or €500m a year to charity – instead of the c€100m that is left currently (approx. one third of third of which goes to religious bodies). Some sectors receive very few bequests – the environment and the arts most notably. That’s not good for the future of the world. And worryingly legacy giving dropped 24% in 2022.

Some people leave very large amounts. Elizabeth O’Kelly famously left over €30 million to five charities in 2017. The average is closer to €10k. For most people, their legacy gift will be the biggest gift they give to charity. Large gifts or increased income from a number of legators can be transformational for a charity. A small number of people have enabled the establishment of philanthropic foundations as a result of their bequests. Examples in Ireland include Tony Ryan and Katherine Howard. The latter enabled a foundation to be set up that has an endowment and continues to make grants annually many years on since her passing.

How do we make change happen – not just tinkering at the edges but dramatic change to treble, quadruple or more the level of giving by way of legacies in future years. Who can we engage on the topic – government, the legal profession, charity fundraisers, boards, volunteers, everyone? How do we do so? Do we need to spend €1m a year on this or €50m. Bord Bia has a food quality mark. Its promotion and campaign activities for it were primarily focused on TV and radio advertising, PR, events and the development and circulation of new and fresh digital content. In all, 17 campaign bursts took place in 2023, including 27 weeks of TV, 23 weeks of radio advertising and 38 weeks on Social Media platforms Instagram, Facebook and TikTok. It also has an overseas marketing remit. In 2023, its Marketing and Promotional Expenditure is in the millions of euros. Imagine government or a wise philanthropist giving a significant budget to enable the promotion of will making, and within that, legacy giving.

Tomorrow’s Legacy Today #5 #cong24 #legacy

Synopsis:

. Using legacy as a trope for looking at more current events
. Considering wider cultural and societal impacts of legacy, maybe more so than more strictly defined personal motivations
. Building on an intergenerational trauma model to propose a newer, empathic, healing modality.

Total Words

735

Reading Time in Minutes

3

Key Takeaways:

  1. Move past the legal utility of legacy
  2.  Consider today and tomorrow, not just yesterday
  3. Legacy impacts can start as butterflies flapping wings
  4. But in starting small, legacy compounds!

About Alan Costello:

Climate venture capital @Resolve
Nature, biodiversity
Golfer!

Contacting Alan Costello

You can contact Alan by email or follow him on Twitter and LinkedIn or see his work with Resolve Partners.

By Alan Costello

Legacy. The origin doesn’t come from the word ‘legend’.
From the ‘auld latin – to legate, to send someone in your place. An Ambassadorial role. One who represents your interests.

I guess we often think about legacy as that which you leave behind, your effect on a thing. But its also current, what impact do you leave on those near and metaphorically near to you, now, today.
What are you doing now that creates legacy around you, that creates lasting impact that will impact on peers as well as future generations.

Of course, it could be bad legacy. You could be one of the people that balls’ed up Lough Neagh. Or voted for Trump. Or who indulged in whataboutery about this incident, this event, that war, and in doing so diminished good, fair thinking and decision making ability.

Or it could be good. You could be the one who led your Tidy Towns, who taught tolerance and independent thinking, who guided impactful innovation around you or you could be one who reached out a hand of friendship and support where it was needed.

Maybe you acted on one person or maybe you acted on millions. Your legacy, your impact, your resonance in the world is each and every persons own thing. I dont mean this in an egotistical sense, although it is related too.

Perhaps you think about creating little ambassadors, who follow in your footsteps. Thats usually true for legacy, although we probably increasingly recognise the choice to not do this, or the inability to have children to warrant an updating of that element of the concept of legacy. Propagating your genes or your name onwards – hopefully we might have begun to leave the pressures and foolishnesses of that in the past.

Leaving A legacy, the definite article of it, often refers to financial terms, leaving your estate to whomever you do leave behind. Is it large or small. Was it used purposefully while you lived. Will it be now that you are gone. Was that in your mind or that of Governments. Buffetts Giving Pledge comes to mind, and opens ideological questions too.

Another concept that comes to mind for me with legacy, is that of intergenerational trauma. I suspect this audience is likely more familiar with the concept. Where traumas have occurred, they can be seen through the parented effects on the next generation, which can further appear in later generations. We have seen this concept discussed in terms of the Troubles in Northern Ireland, of economic adversity in some regions and historically in the famine and its possible effects still held today. A study reported this week discussed the effect of early experience of bereavement leading to premature biological ageing.

I then wonder about what should exist by the same token, the intergenerational healing.

What would be the effect on future generations of our individual and cohesive efforts towards positive impacts on sharing different wealths to our direct and wider community.
Consider the Good Ancestor Movement.

I am minded, practised and desiring to consider scaling and global sized efforts.
When I think financial models, I think about leveraging to wider audiences through appropriate gifting.
When I think about community impact, I think about integration of global populations, of the built environment, of shared learnings, of the cultural and sporting tools at our fingertips
When I think about legacy, I think about our world, our planet, our nature, our peoples role as a living partner
When I think about impact, I might think about intergenerational healing and growth

Legacy, doesnt come from the word legend, but that doesnt mean you cant be one!